Hi all,
I am relatively new to fantasy football, and I wanted to get some unbiased input on a trade between two managers (Joe and Rob) in the league. Some managers in our league are really upset and have gotten into arguments over this, and I wanted to see if an outside opinion can shed light.
The league has no veto power , so all trades automatically go through.
The league does allow up to 3 keepers (with complex rules where the round they are kept in is based on the round that they are drafted in previous year). However, I am fairly certain that the players traded will not be kept by either team next year. So essentially, the trade below can be evaluated without assuming any keepers.
Joe acquired:
-Kareem Hunt
-Alex Collins
-Rob’s Round 6 pick next year
Rob acquired:
-Keenan Allen
-Joe’s Round 1 pick next year
Keep in mind that this happened on November 16, when Kareem Hunt was on IR and Chris Carson wasn’t yet ruled out for the season (meaning Alex Collins was lower in value at the time of the trade).
Just prior to the trade, the teams looked like this:
The trade definitely seems lopsided and heavily beneficial for Rob as he got essentially a first round pick and a top level WR (Keenan Allen). Both managers refuse to explain their logic here. Is this trade as lopsided as I think it is?
Any feedback would greatly be appreciated. Thanks!