The rankings have the WR ranked so high that for the first few rounds a WR is almost always the value play. That quickly gets me to 3 WR on my roster in the first 4 rounds. After that, there usually are WRs still at the top of the ranking list and the analyzer will advocate me getting a WR in the next few rounds. To me it doesn’t seem too smart to get bench WRs i can’t play in the first few weeks over a RB/TE/QB i will play the first few weeks. How do you handle this situation? Thanks
There is little info to go on but in general you are correct. I always found common sense better than an analyzer. 
There are 8-9 legit top WRs before getting into 25 or so who should be in or close to the same tier. YES, you want a top gun but ? from there.
It’s maybe about the same with RBs but not as strong.
I always try to get 1 and 1 BUT not giving up a top guy because he is not the preferred balance position.
Thank you, I appreciate the response